Drop-dead hip or cluelessly clueless? Sofia Coppola's Marie Antoinette, a candy-colored portrait of France's infamous teen queen, is a graceful, charming and sometimes witty confectionat least for its first hour.
The famously shy Coppola may be an inscrutable personality, but her bold exposé of backstage royalty opens with a big wink and a few crashing chords, courtesy of Gang of Four. A slice of Austrian apple strudel imported to marry the 15-year-old French dauphin, Marie Antoinette (Kirsten Dunst) arrives nakedly vulnerable in Versailles. Here, as in Coppola's previous features, an unformed young woman must find her way in a confusing, if stylish, worldit's as though the defining moment in the filmmaker's artistic life was her arrival as a 20-year-old actress on the set of Dad's Godfather III.
Coppola, who not only directed but also wrote the screenplay, has no sense of being overawed by her material. Where The Virgin Suicides and Lost in Translation were dreamy, Marie Antoinette is more like marvy. (The director's preferred term is "girly.") Largely shot on location at Versailles, the movie is purposefully hermetic. If it were a prison film, which in some ways it is, the title might be The Big Doll House. Marie finds herself in a hissing snake pit where the devil wears Prada and goodness knows what else. She soon gets a white-wig makeover and a closet full of satin hoopskirts, but her position is scarcely secure. Everyone in this kingdom of gossip knows that her marriage to the awkward prince (Jason Schwartzman) has yet to be consummatedlet alone produce an heir.
Basically a small story in a gilded frame, with relatively little dialogue to distract from the spectacle, Marie Antoinette is not without a certain vérité. When it premiered last May at Cannes, few foreign journalists missed the opportunity to compare the rigid hierarchies and inexplicable protocols of the French court to those of the film festival. (Marie's naïve complaint, "This is ridiculous," squelched by the haughty rejoinder, "This, madam, is Versailles," got the movie's biggest laugh.) Coppola, who directed what remains Scarlet Johansson's least mannered performance, here "documents" Dunst's innocent boredom as she takes solace in jewels, clothes and sweets. The ruling complex is more edible than Oedipal.
Marie Antoinette's sanitized view of eighteenth-century hygiene is as tasteful as its deferentialand seemingly unappreciatedFrancophilia. Although widely touted (not just by Coppola family retainers) as a leading contender for the Palme d'Or, Marie Antoinette was greeted at Cannes with sour boos. Indeed, likely miffed by her movie's contemptuous reception, Coppola seems to have violated one of the festival's sacred rituals by blowing off the traditional post-premiere banquet hosted by Cannes supremo Gilles Jacobleaving early with her dad in tow.
Such petulance, if that's what it was, is understandable. Cued by Bow Wow Wow's "I Want Candy," Coppola's pink-and-pistachio color schemes and sugar-frosted mise-en-scène, all heaps of haute cuisine and powdered towers of hair, are nothing if not easy on the eye. (As a representation of the late eighteenth-century good life, her images are closer in their shiny opulence to Fragonard's paintings than Watteau's.) There's no disputing Coppola's adroit party-planning or her delicious casting. Talking from the side of his mouth as though swapping yarns at the Lion's Head, Rip Torn makes a swaggering Louis XV; a confidently skanky Asia Argento is no less hilarious as his paramour Madame du Barry. Coppola cousin Schwartzman is suitably diffident as the future Louis XVI. Steve Coogan and Judy Davis are droll courtiers; Marianne Faithfull is an appropriately grand Empress Maria Teresa.
When the king dies, the young people are stunned, but Mariewhose valley girl enthusiasm has already inspired a snooty opera audience to applaud the showrises to the occasion. Cover girl avant la lettre, she becomes queen of the all-night rave, takes a lover, and, with motherhood, creates her own domain. (Like The Queen, Marie Antoinette seems haunted by the specter of Diana Spencer, another royally persecuted broodmare who, as noted by Camille Paglia, also met a violent end, pursued by the mobin France, no less.)
Carefree proprietress of a miniature play farm, Marie A. takes the notion of a people's princess literally. She masquerades as a milkmaid and reads Rousseau to her ladies-in-waitingas if. What could be more decadent than such fashionista rusticity? Coppola, however, is temperamentally unable to distinguish history from personality and personality from dress-up; the filmmaker's attempt to redeem her heroine's shallowness reveals her own. The more problematic aspects of Marie's reignthe embarrassing "affair of the necklace," her mega-Imelda clothes budget, and likely treason against the revolutionare airbrushed away.
Marie's gravitas arrives like a bolt from the blue; the bubble bursts and the movie crashes definitively to earth at the moment when, informed of her legendary one-liner, the queen turns all, like, serious: "I would never say that." Whatever. Coppola ends on the image of a tragically trashed imperial boudoir. Let 'em lick icing.