So even though the report received a positive spin because it didn't call for her head, Touhill still faces a unanimously approved faculty committee report expressing no-confidence in her leadership and charging that her practices have created a "chronic fiscal crisis" on campus that has led to "weakened academic programs." ("Taking Aim on Blanche," RFT, Sept. 22). But the review released Monday, completed by a four-person team out of Columbia, found that UM-St. Louis is "financially stronger today than it was in (fiscal year) 1991." But the review does state that the budget is "consistently developed on overly optimistic revenue estimates, which when unrealized necessitate reductions in authorized expenditures." The report said this practice was abnormal for university budgeting. In Touhill's response to her critics, she appropriates a line from Ronald Reagan when she concludes, "Are the students and citizens of this region better served today than 10 years ago?" Touhill suggests they are. Faculty members who don't buy into that concept will have a chance to make their case to James Cofer, the university system's vice president for finance and administration, at a meeting next Tuesday.
Give us your feedback by e-mailing "Short Cuts" at firstname.lastname@example.org, faxing 314-615-6716 or calling 314-615-6711.