Democratic Power Brokers Join Quest to Stop Kacey Cordes' Campaign


  • Courtesy of Cordes campaign
  • Kacey Cordes.

Kacey Cordes and the St. Louis Board of Election Commissioners faced off in court this morning, with lawyers for both sides trading arguments over whether the 38-year-old mayoral hopeful deserves a spot on the April 4 general election ballot. 

Cordes' barely month-old campaign as an independent mayoral candidate ran aground in February after the Election Board invalidated her candidacy. The board cited her failure to turn in roughly 500 signatures from registered St. Louis voters — a requirement stipulated in the city's election ordinances. In response, Cordes sued the board, arguing that the commissioners had misinterpreted the requirements for independent candidates.

And a third party joined the proceedings in circuit court today: Jane Dueker, an attorney with ample experience in city election squabbles, was granted permission by Circuit Judge Joan Moriarty to intervene in the case on behalf of Democratic National Committee delegate and former St. Louis City Democratic Central Committee chairman Brian Wahby.

See also: Kacey Cordes Sues St. Louis Election Board to Enter Mayoral Race

That Wahby, a well-known power broker in city politics, would feel the need to weigh in on the case implies that Cordes' candidacy represents more than just a sideline annoyance for local Democrats. As we reported Tuesday, Cordes' lawsuit argues that an independent candidate should be allowed essentially to nominate herself to the general election — without the pesky requirement for signatures — because of a loophole for "independent," as opposed to "non partisan," candidates.

For Dueker and the Election Board, however, that semantic distinction is meaningless in a city whose election laws only make sense when the terms are used interchangeably.

"Yes, collecting 500 signatures is hard, but two other people did it for this election," said Dueker in court, referring to independent mayoral candidates Larry Rice and Tyrone Austin, both of whom paid their filing fees and (unlike Cordes) provided the requisite signatures by the February 13 deadline.

Dueker added, "The idea that we have to put off all voting because one person doesn’t want to follow the rules? That’s absurd."

Judge Moriarty did not issue a ruling at the conclusion of the hearing, but a decision could come down as soon as this afternoon or Monday. The elections board is seeking a quick decision so that it can start printing ballots for the general election.

Follow Danny Wicentowski on Twitter at @D_Towski. E-mail the author

Support Local Journalism.
Join the Riverfront Times Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.

Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.

Join the Riverfront Times Club for as little as $5 a month.