Last year, the city council of Springfield took a historic stand, extending the city's non-discrimination ordinance -- which governs housing, employment and public accommodations like parks and city pools -- to gay, lesbian and transgender men and women.
Last night, voters repealed it.
In a narrow margin, 51.43 percent voted to repeal the LGBT protections, while 48.57 percent voted to keep them.
The fight in the southwest Missouri city echoed the one in Indiana in recent weeks, where Governor Mike Pence had signed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act -- which critics argued would open the door to businesses citing their religious beliefs even as they refused to serve gay weddings. Indiana lawmakers amended the law in the face of a national uproar.
But even Indiana's amended law offers LGBT residents no designated protections. Springfield's ordinance was initially passed to do just that.
The council voted 6-3 in October to add the special provision, but opponents quickly gathered enough signatures to either force a repeal or send it to voters. When the council declined to repeal, that kicked off a hard-fought campaign, as the Springfield News-Leader reported last night, and as one opponent to the measure put it, "a victory for the faith community."
Justin Burnett, who won a council seat Tuesday, supported the repeal of the ordinance. He said it was a win for small business and the faith community.
"The problem with the ordinance is that it had so many potential legal ramifications for businesses, for public safety, for the good of the city," he said. "There was no need for the ordinance."
He said he hopes the city can move forward. He says he believes his role is to "love all and serve all."
"A lot of people of faith thought this ordinance neglected their constitutional and God-given rights," he said. "So it is a victory for the faith community."
Expect to see a lot of furor directed at Missouri's third-largest city in coming days. The national media is already picking up on this story, only hours after the vote. And so while the election may be over, the controversy almost certainly is not.
See also: Same-Sex Marriage Is Legal in Missouri
Support Local Journalism.
Join the Riverfront Times Press Club
Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.
Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.
Join the Riverfront Times Club for as little as $5 a month.