Missouri has the worst puppy mills in the nation -- and lawmakers in the state are working hard to make sure it stays that way! So says the Humane Society, which announced this week that Missouri ranks No. 1 for terrible puppy farms in the United States and is now going after a piece of legislation that passed yesterday which critics say is designed to block all anti-cruelty efforts.
"It's a pro-puppy mill bill," Amanda Good, Missouri state director for the U.S. Humane Society, tells Daily RFT. "We're going to start an education campaign and make sure the public knows exactly what this resolution is."
She is referring to House Joint Resolution 11, a so-called "right-to-farm" bill, which, she says, is just a puppy mill industry effort to avoid all regulation.
The proposal comes from Representative Jason Smith, who is currently running for Congress. The bill proposes a constitutional amendment, which means voters will have to directly approve it on the ballot.
And Missouri residents will have that opportunity in 2014, with lawmakers giving final approvals yesterday to Smith's bill. There is no veto option in this case, so voters will be weighing in on "right to farm" next year.
Smith did not respond to a request for comment yesterday, but has argued that the bill is a measure to protect the state's vital farm industry. He wrote on Twitter:
I am proud the #moleg finally passed Right to Farm to protect the 110,000 family farms in MO, a multi-billion dollar industry for our state.— Jason Smith (@RepJasonSmith) May 15, 2013
Out-of-state activists have attacked farming in many states and now MO has ability to defend our family farms from these groups #MOValues— Jason Smith (@RepJasonSmith) May 15, 2013
As written, the constitutional amendment says "the right of farmers and ranchers to engage in farming and ranching practices shall be forever guaranteed in this state."
The problem, according to the Humane Society, is that farming in this context, applies to dogs and cats as well, meaning the amendment, if approved by voters, could be used to block anti-cruelty regulation and even to try and undo past animal rights victories.
Good says this is direct payback against the narrow passage in 2010 of Proposition B aimed at curbing the cruelty of the state's notorious puppy mills. And Smith and other supporters do say the bill is an effort to push back against assaults on the rights of farm families.
Continue for more response from the Humane Society and for the full bill.
If voters approve the measure, "There's no way we can pass laws here in the state to protect animals," Good argues.
"This is going to restrict the state legislature from passing any bills that have to do with animal welfare," she says.
We'll update if we get a chance to speak with Smith.
In the meantime, here's a copy of the final version of the approved bill.
Support Local Journalism.
Join the Riverfront Times Press Club
Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.
Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.
Join the Riverfront Times Club for as little as $5 a month.