Opponents of smoking bans in Missouri argue that the government should not regulate the policies of private businesses. And now, Missouri State Rep. Kathie Conway has her own government proposal that she says would send that message very clearly: Punish cities that enact overreaching no-smoking ordinances. How?
Take away the tax revenue the city gets from establishments hurt by the smoking bans.
"The goal is to protect private property rights," Conway, a Republican from St. Charles, tells Daily RFT. "I just really wanted to get the conversation going."
On the latter, she's definitely had some success.
See also: - Smoking Ban for St. Clair County Public Housing Likely Start of a Trend - Statewide Smoking Ban in Missouri? Dem Senator Proposes Broad Restrictions - Smoking Ban in St. Louis County: What Kinds of Businesses Should Be Exempt?
Conway's House Bill 1021, which had a hearing last week, is pretty short and simple in its current draft form. It says:
If any political subdivision prohibits the use of tobacco in a private business...all tax revenue generated by the business through property taxes and county sales taxes shall be remitted to the local school district in lieu of the political subdivision.
In other words, if signed into law, it means local municipalities and counties would lose tax revenue if they successfully passed smoking bans.
The bill has nothing to do with her opinion on smoking, she says.
"I just want to be absolutely clear," she tells us, "I disagree with smoking. I think smoking is a bad thing to do. I'm not promoting tobacco."
What she is promoting is the rights of private businesses to allow this kind of activity on their premises if they choose, she says.
Since it got attention last week, opponents -- including cities interested in smoking bans and anti-smoking advocacy groups -- have argued that it's a misguided attempt to punish cities working to improve public health.
Redirecting that tax revenue, critics say, would hurt municipal services and thus negatively impact all residents of a city with a ban.
Continue for details on Rep. Conway's latest revisions to the bill and the full proposal.
Conway says that she has been working on a revision of the draft that would specify that this would only apply to "entertainment" businesses that specifically want to allow smoking and are hurt by a ban. That category, she says, would include casinos, restaurants, bowling alleys and more.
Conway argues that ordinances that give exemptions to certain kinds of businesses are not fair.
"I just want to try and make it more of a level playing field," she says.
Simply put, government shouldn't get in the way, Conway argues.
Responses have been pretty evenly split between support and opposition, she says. "I've heard from a lot of nonsmokers...that say it should be the business owners' right."
Others concerned with the ill health impacts of smoking, however, aren't pleased, she says.
It's unclear if the proposal will get far in this final stretch of the legislative session. But if it doesn't advance, she may try again.
"I'm not sure I'm finished if it doesn't go forward this year," she says.
Here's the latest available draft.
Support Local Journalism.
Join the Riverfront Times Press Club
Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.
Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.
Join the Riverfront Times Club for as little as $5 a month.