In the aftermath of the Boston Marathon bombing this week, officials across the country have labeled the attack an act of terrorism, even at this early stage in the investigation, in which little is publicly known about potential suspects.
"Based on the evidence at this point, is there any difference between Sandy Hook and Boston other than the choice of weapon?" McCaskill asked, referencing the Newtown elementary-school shooting last year. Check out her full comments in the video below.
See also: - Boston Bombing: St. Louis Runner Recalls Cry of "What Kind of World Do We Live In!" - Roy Blunt, No on Gun Control: "We Must Do Everything We Can to Prevent Tragedies" - Boston Bombing: St. Louis Family Just Missed Explosion: "It Was Sickening"
McCaskill directed her question to Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano during a congressional hearing yesterday.
The topic was particularly timely given the Senate's high-stakes vote on a bipartisan gun control bill that would have expanded background checks to gun shows and online sales. McCaskill voted in favor of the bill and her Republican colleague Roy Blunt voted no. It didn't pass.
That legislation was sparked in part by the devastating school shooting in December that left twenty children dead in Connecticut.
Here are excerpts of the exchange yesterday after McCaskill asked about the difference between Boston and Newtown:
"In terms of intent for death and destruction and injury, no," Napolitano said, "Methodology, yes. And we don't know the motivation behind, certainly, Boston -- we don't know whether it was domestic, it's international...."
"Or if it was identical to the motivation in Sandy Hook," McCaskill suggested. "It's impossible for me to sit at the table today and say they are identical except in effect and impact," Napolitano said....
"We are so quick to call Boston terror," McCaskill said. "Why aren't we calling the man with the high-capacity assault weapon and the high-capacity magazine, why aren't we calling him a terrorist?"
"I don't know the answer to that question," the secretary replied.
Our small but mighty local team works tirelessly to bring you high-quality, uncensored news and cultural coverage of St. Louis and beyond.
Unlike many newspapers, ours is free – and we'd like to keep it that way, because we believe, now more than ever, everyone deserves access to accurate, independent coverage of their community.
Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing pledge, your support helps keep St. Louis' true free press free.