Organic Farmers' Suit Against Monsanto Dismissed (and Dissed) by Federal Judge


Judge scolds organic coalition for legal tactics against agri-giant - IMAGE VIA
  • Image via
  • Judge scolds organic coalition for legal tactics against agri-giant
A federal district court judge in New York threw out a lawsuit yesterday brought by pro-organic groups against St. Louis-based Monsanto, scolding the plaintiffs for their tactics. 

Some 60 seed companies, family farmers and other organic folks had filed suit last March. Their stated goal was to erect a legal shield around themselves so that Monsanto could not sue them for patent infringement if the agri-giant's crops sprouted up accidentally in their fields (through cross-pollination or seed drift, etc.).

They feared such legal action, they complained, because Monsanto:
holds many patents....that it has aggressively asserted against literally hundreds of farmers, including those farmers who became contaminated by Monsanto's transgenic seed through no fault of their own.
Those fears are unfounded, concluded Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald in her memorandum and order.  The organic folks, she wrote, "overstate the magnitude of [Monsanto's] patent enforcement."

In reality, Monsanto brought 144 patent-infringement lawsuits against farmers between 1997 and April 2010 — an average of 13 per year — which, Buchwald asserted, is "hardly significant when compared to the number of farms in the United States, approximately two million." (Plus, she points out, Monsanto has never brought a case against an unwitting organic farmer whose field had some volunteer GM crop).

Yesterday, Monsanto heralded the tearing down of this "historic myth," which has been "perpetuated" by members of the organic camp "through the Internet." 

About three weeks after filing the suit, the coalition wrote Monsanto a letter. They asked the company to waive the right to sue them for patent-infringement.

Monsanto declined to do so, reiterating that it's not company policy "to exercise our patent rights where trace amounts of our seed or traits are present in [a] farmer's fields as a result of inadvertent means."

'Ah-ha!' said the coalition in effect, 'Monsanto won't promise to not sue us! That means we're in danger!'

No, you're not, ruled Judge Buchwald. She considered such an interpretation "a deliberate misreading," then really let the coalition have it:

"Plaintiffs' letter to defendants seems to have been nothing more than an attempt to create a controversy where none exists. This effort to convert a statement that defendants have no intention of bringing suit into grounds for maintaining a case, if accepted, would disincentivize patentees from ever attempting to provide comfort to those whom they do not intend to sue, behavior which should be countenanced and encouraged. In contrast, plaintiffs' argument is baseless and their tactics not to be tolerated."

Judge Buchwald dismissed the lawsuit on the grounds that "there is no substantial controversy" and that there was "no injury traceable" to Monsanto.

Read the whole order below:
Organic Seed Growers et al v. Monsanto

Support Local Journalism.
Join the Riverfront Times Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.

Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.

Join the Riverfront Times Club for as little as $5 a month.