House Transportation Bill Would Gut Metro Funding


The US House of Representatives is scheduled to discuss today its version of the 2012 transportation bill -- a bill that could have major ramifications for the City and the counties.

If passed, the bill, HR 7, states that mass transit would no longer automatically receive one-fifth of the fuel tax revenue. Instead Metro, and mass transit systems nation-wide, would be forced to compete against other programs for that money, with no success guaranteed on a yearly basis. Losing the funding would change Metro's budget planning now and for the future, including maintenance of the existing bus fleet and potential expansion.

Not surprisingly, Metro is against the bill. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood is on record as calling it "The worst transportation bill I've ever seen during 35 years of public service." The Obama Administration, however, does support it.

With a $1 trillion deficit every year, the federal government does need to slash pay-outs and increase revenue. In addition to changing the disbursement of the fuel tax revenue, HR 7 would also expand offshore drilling and reduce the retirement benefits of federal workers -- both measures that could conceivably make and/or save some much needed funds.


Support Local Journalism.
Join the Riverfront Times Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.

Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.

Join the Riverfront Times Club for as little as $5 a month.