Despite Drury's contentions, it has not produced substantial or persuasive evidence that the Commission relied on anything but the true value in money or its value in exchange....Although the hearing officer states that Drury failed to meet its burden of proof because it failed to present an opinion of market value and substantial and persuasive evidence that the value it proposed is indicative of the market value of the subject property, we find instead that Drury failed to meet its burden because it failed to overcome the presumption that Assessor's valuation is correct.D'ya hear that, huddled masses yearning to pay lower taxes? The burden of proof is on you -- not the taxman. Definitely something worth thinking about before you spend five-and-a-half years fighting one of these.
Our small but mighty local team works tirelessly to bring you high-quality, uncensored news and cultural coverage of St. Louis and beyond.
Unlike many newspapers, ours is free – and we'd like to keep it that way, because we believe, now more than ever, everyone deserves access to accurate, independent coverage of their community.
Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing pledge, your support helps keep St. Louis' true free press free.