Nixon Signs "Missouri Compromise Solution" Version of Prop. B


Governor, how could you resist those puppy-dog eyes? - JENNIFER SILVERBERG
  • Jennifer Silverberg
  • Governor, how could you resist those puppy-dog eyes?

Just as he said he would last week, Governor Jay Nixon signed Senate Bill 113 this morning. The bill tweaks Proposition B, the initiative to put limits on dog breeding facilities (the nice term for "puppy mills") that voters passed last November.

The bill, now known as the Canine Cruelty Prevention Act, removes the prohibition against owners keeping more than 50 dogs for breeding purposes. Instead of making any violation of the law a felony, it reduces it to a class C misdemeanor. It scales back Prop. B's requirements for cage sizes and access to the outdoors. It allows owners to stack cages, but stacking them without an "impervious layer between the cages" is a Class A misdemeanor.

It does, however, keep the requirement that the dogs be fully examined by vets and have larger exercise areas.

It also protects Nixon from criticism that he allowed himself to be swayed by national organizations that largely funded support for Prop. B instead of his own Missourians.

The governor issued an official statement this afternoon:

I am extremely pleased that agriculture and animal welfare groups from across our state have worked together to reach a Missouri solution to this complex issue. The Missouri solution upholds the will of the voters by protecting the welfare of dogs, while also ensuring the future of Missouri agriculture. I look forward to having the Missouri solution, Senate Bill 161, on my desk as soon as possible.

Reaction among supporters of Prop. B has been mixed. State organizations (the Humane Society of Missouri and the Missouri Alliance for Animal Legislation) are for the "Missouri Solution," while national organizations (the Humane Society of the United States and the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals) oppose it.

Bob Baker, president of the Missouri Alliance for Animal Legislation, told the Post-Dispatch the "solution" was "a dramatic improvement for the dogs. How do you walk away from that?"

Debate over Bill 161 continues this afternoon.

Support Local Journalism.
Join the Riverfront Times Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.

Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.

Join the Riverfront Times Club for as little as $5 a month.