Could Anti-Prop B Campaign Be Sneaky Influential?

by

comment
​It seems that Prop B is the issue that just won't die. Voted in by a 60,000-vote margin a week and a half ago, there's already talk of state legislature gutting the new regulations come January. 

Here at Daily RFT we did a little electoral math of our own. Like, actual math. (Don't worry, we used a calculator.) We were curious to see how the money broke down for both campaigns on a per-vote basis.

The results were surprisingly disparate in light of how close the race was. You can find them behind the jump!
It's a well-known fact by now that the Yes! on Prop B campaign far out-fundraised and out-spent the anti-Prop B campaign, Alliance for Truth. But by just how much? The Missouri Ethics Commission's final tally of the Alliance for Truth's fundraising came in at $121,851.47. Tiny, especially compared to the Missourians for the Protection of Dogs/Yes! on Prop B's $4,018,721.66

Divided by the number of votes each side won, the per-vote spending pans out to: 

Yes on B: $4.04 spent per vote
No on B: $0.13 spent per vote

If No on B came that close to victory while spending a fraction of the pro-B campaign's budget, could their influence in the new legislative session be even more powerful than anticipated as well?

Tags

Support Local Journalism.
Join the Riverfront Times Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.

Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.

Join the Riverfront Times Club for as little as $5 a month.