A total eclipse of the sun.
A Missouri judge overseeing a Sunshine Law claim has dismissed the lawsuit in a case that ultimately hinged on the identity of commenters to an online forum.
In January 2007 a group of residents calling themselves Concerned Citizens for Crystal City
(C4) filed suit against the municipality of Crystal City and developer Wings Enterprises
claiming that the two violated the state's open-record laws while hammering out a backroom deal
to build an iron-ore smelter in the Jefferson County township.
Before the lawsuit was filed -- and throughout the past two-plus years -- those opposed to the iron-ore smelter have logged into the website
of C4 to voice their thoughts and share information. The website allowed users to comment and post information anonymously.
During the course of the Sunshine Law claim, defendant Wings Enterprises won a court order
C4 to hand over all information posted on the group's website as well
as the identity of all those who've posted comments on the site.
Meanwhile, the administrator for the C4 site -- Jack Ginnever
-- countered that its registration agreement
stipulated that it would not provide user information to "any third
party" and to do so might leave the group open to additional lawsuits.
"There is a legal and moral obligation to abide by that contract because
the posters of the forum believe that their identities will be
protected," writes Ginnever on the C4 website. "That is the purpose of this forum. If the identities of
the users were known they would not have been so open and passionate
about their feelings regarding the controversial smelter project in
In an affidavit in response
to the court order, Ginnever stated that he would be willing to provide
the defendants with the the identity of certain commenters if they
could convince the court why they were relevant to the Sunshine Law
That argument fell flat to Judge Benjamin Lewis
last week dismissed the lawsuit after Ginnever and C4 refused to hand
over the identify of all the website's users.
Writes Lewis in his Nov. 24 ruling
"In a simpler time the [C4 website] would have been a box full of
letters about the proposed smelter project; letters solicited by
plaintiff Ginnever, signed psuedonymously and made available by
Ginnever for anyone to read. However, only Ginnever would know the
return addresses of the writers. There is no question that in this
example those letters and the return addresses would be discoverable."
(Question: Does the judge not know that you can send letters w/o return addresses? Posting content online without leaving an IP address is a bit harder challenge. Ask stltoday.com editor Kurt Greenbaum
about that one.)
C4 says it plans to appeal Lewis' ruling.
In related news, last month
the state auditor released an audit
of Crystal City which mentioned
Sunshine Law violations regarding the smelter. The auditor's report was
not mentioning in the judge's ruling.