Is AB-InBev Trying to Play Down the Belgian Roots of Bud Light Golden Wheat?

by

ANHEUSER-BUSCH.COM
  • anheuser-busch.com
On Monday, Anheuser-Busch-InBev announced the nationwide release of Bud Light Golden Wheat, the latest spin-off of the company's most popular brand (Chelada, anyone?) and another attempt by the world's largest brewer to break into the micro-brew market and quench the nation's ever-increasing thirst for craft beers.

Described in the press release as "an unfiltered wheat brewed with citrus, a hint of coriander and the superior drinkability of Bud Light" the beer is essentially A-B's attempt at imitating Blue Moon. They even suggest serving it with an orange-slice garnish.

Just as they did for Bud Light Lime, the company will spend a mint -- about $30 million -- marketing their new brew.

Predictably, beer snobs' initial response to the hype has been flatter than a week-old keg. A critic at Pint Log described it as "extremely watered down" and "totally devoid of flavor." (It's possible he just drank a regular Bud Light, but we'll give him the benefit of the doubt.)

Lew Bryson, author of the beer blog Seen Through a Glass, was less harsh in his critique but he posed an interesting question: With the massive marketing push behind Bud Light Golden Wheat, why hasn't AB-Inbev specified what specific variety of wheat beer they have created, especially when they're targeting a demographic (craft beer drinkers) that's familiar with different types of wheat beers? Is it because Golden Wheat is actually a Belgian-inspired witbier, and the now Belgian-owned company desperately wants to avoid the impression that they've turned an American classic into some European sissy beer meant to be sipped out of a schooner?

blue_moon_pale_ale.jpg
Here's what Bryson says in full in his post:
...it bothers me that the success of Blue Moon has led wannabe competitors to just class these beers as "wheat" beers. Guys, you're working for a brewery, one with world-wide connections and a huge staff of highly-trained brewers, and I've met and talked with some of them: you know damned well that there is more than one type of wheat beer. So why do you let the marketeers be stupid about this? It's not just a wheat beer, it's a --

Oh. My. God. It just hit me. Of course. It's a witbier-inspired beer...a Belgian-inspired beer. Is it that InBud doesn't want people making the Leuven connection, doesn't want to in-their-face American customers with the Belgian-based dark overlords of Budweiser? I don't know, but it is a consideration.
As Bryson points out, there are several well-known varieties of wheat beer. Perhaps the most popular type is German hefeweizen. Local brewer Schlafly does a fine take on this style and literally thousands of micro-brewers worldwide have created countless variations. Less popular wheats are the sour beers Berliner weisse and lambic, which have low alcohol content are usually served with flavored syrups. The Wiki on Wheat Beers serves as a nice primer, and touches on a few of the more obscure strains.

Then there's Belgian witbier ("white beer"). This is "a barley/wheat, top-fermented beer" that "gets its name due to suspended yeast and wheat proteins which cause the beer to look hazy, or white, when cold."

The Wikipedia entry points out that the the most common variety comes from "the Belgian tradition of using flavourings such as coriander and orange peel"--exactly the two flavors described by AB-InBev in the Bud Light Golden Wheat press release. Yet any description classifying the beer as a Belgian wheat is notably absent from the same document. 

HoegaardenWhitewithGlass.jpg
​Moreover, you'd think AB-InBev would know a thing or two about witbiers seeing how the company's Hoegaarden -- a white ale brewed in Belgium -- is the company's fastest growing brand.  

Daily RFT phoned the Anheuser-Busch PR department in St. Louis several times seeking to confirm that Bud Light Golden Wheat was, in fact, a Belgian wheat. We also asked for an explanation as to why that seemingly important detail (they're marketing to craft beer drinkers interested in these things, right?) was omitted from the marketing campaign. After speaking to three different representatives, with each asking repeatedly to clarify the question, no one ever called back to offer a response.

Perhaps we should have phoned the company's new global headquarters in Belgium. They know a thing or two about wheat beers there.

comment

Tags