St. Louis Police Apologize to "Anarchists"


Dan Green, owner of the home, called "Bolozone", where many of the protesters were rounded up by police.
  • Dan Green, owner of the home, called "Bolozone", where many of the protesters were rounded up by police.
The St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department has reached a settlement with four would-be protesters arrested prior to the 2003 World Agriculture Forum held in St. Louis.

The demonstrators -- who the police dubbed "anarchists" -- claimed the police unlawfully detained them prior to the forum and violated their civil rights. Among the allegations made were that the police illegally searched the home where they were staying, urinated on their property, arrested some of them for the bogus charge of riding bicycles without proper licenses and subjected one to a humiliating public strip-search.

Under terms of the settlement, the police wrote a letter of apology to the four protesters who remain in the case and awarded each plaintiff $13,500.

In a statement (the entirety of which is viewable after the jump), Clayton attorney Gary Sarachan, who represented the plaintiffs on behalf of the ACLU, said: "This case supports an important and fundamental principle. There is no justification, legal or otherwise, to arrest innocent persons simply because they fit some profile."

For more on the arrests, check out the following RFT articles...



Contact: Anthony Rothert
Legal Director
(314) 361-2111

ACLU Applauds Police Apology to Protesters

ST. LOUIS, August 24, 2009--In settlement of an ACLU of Eastern Missouri lawsuit, the St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners has agreed to pay damages and send a letter of apology to four activists. St. Louis police officers violated their first and fourth amendment rights to prevent them from participating in protests at the World Agricultural Forum ("WAF") in St. Louis in May 2003.
Acting under a written plan to preemptively root out individuals fitting a loose profile the Police Department described as 'anarchists," St Louis City Police Officers at one location made a warrantless entry into a house occupied by several activists, arrested and handcuffed each of them for the crime of "occupying a condemned building," and subjected one woman to an unlawful and humiliating strip search.

At a second location, the police made a warrantless entry and search under the guise of a previous building inspection revealing serious housing violations. The document that allegedly showed the results of the inspection was, by a later admission of the officer who signed it, false and no building violations were discovered.

The Plaintiff who owned the building had property damaged during the search and was forced to miss the event he planned to lawfully protest.  In addition, a group of activists riding their bicycles to the protest were arrested, handcuffed, booked and jailed for the crime of "riding a bicycle without a license." Knowing that it was not unlawful to ride a bicycle without a license, a Police Supervisor later changed the charge  to "obstructing the flow of traffic while riding a bicycle."  The charges were never prosecuted. The bicyclists were unable to attend the protest because of their unlawful arrests.
An important part of this settlement is a letter of apology from the Police Department to the young activists. In the letter, the Board writes that the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department "sincerely regrets the grievances of plaintiffs arising from the Department's response..." and acknowledges that the "infringement of civil liberties of the citizenry was not warranted..."

ACLU-EM Executive Director Brenda Jones said "We are appreciative of the  police department's letter and congratulate Chief Isom on his leadership in resolving this matter."

"This case supports an important and fundamental principle," said Gary Sarachan, of the Clayton firm Capes, Sokol, Goodman & Sarachan, PC, who served as an ACLU cooperating attorney on the case. "There is no justification, legal or otherwise, to arrest innocent persons simply because they fit some profile."

"It is a serious miscarriage of justice when those we rely on to enforce the law are the very ones who violate it," said ACLU-EM Legal Director Anthony Rothert.

Sheila Greenbaum, another Capes, Sokol, Goodman & Sarachan attorney who represented the activists said, "This is an ACLU victory for the First and Fourth Amendments of the Constitution as well as for our clients, young individuals who wanted to peacefully protest in the city of Saint Louis, Missouri. We believe this outcome will restore their faith in our system of justice."

The case is Appel, et al. v. City of St. Louis, et al.  Other attorneys representing the activists include Rory Ellinger, of the O'Fallon firm of Ellinger & Associates, P.C., William Quick, of the Law Offices of William T. Quick in St. Louis.

Support Local Journalism.
Join the Riverfront Times Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.

Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.

Join the Riverfront Times Club for as little as $5 a month.