I don't believe in Santa Claus, or the Great Pumpkin. But I hoped a prominent -- if reclusive -- local developer who says he wants to do great things for the city would follow through on an invite from civic-minded church folks.
McKee has yet to answer that question in public. He has spoken with Metropolitan Congregations United and Mayor Francis Slay. The message relayed from both parties is that McKee doesn't have detailed plans.
An appearance at a public meeting would represent a major departure from the ongoing status quo: silence on his part, accompanied by rampant speculation on the part of most everyone else.
McKee was a no-show.
Here's what did happen at the meeting: Roger Duncan, secretary of MCU's north-side cluster of congregations, recited MCU's four development principles (one of which is to not displace existing residents). Then MCU introduced a North City Stakeholders Table on Redevelopment with representatives from the following groups: JeffVanderLou Initiative, MCU, North Grand Neighborhood Services, Old North St. Louis Restoration Group, Pruitt-Igoe Development Corp., Third Ward Neighborhood Council, and St. Louis Development Corp.
That last stakeholder is the agency that oversees all tax-delinquent and abandoned property in the city that isn't sold at the sheriff's auction. The St. Louis Development Corp. might be the only entity that controls as much land on the north side as Paul McKee. (Maybe even more land than McKee.) And, many of McKee's holdings are next to St. Louis Development Corp. property.
MCU is calling on its members to get McKee to the table. Thursday night the group distributed postcards for members to hand out at their churches. The goal is to collect and deliver to Paul McKee 2,000 signed postcards that bear the heading "Uniting for the Good of St. Louis."
Roger Duncan told me the word was that McKee didn't like all the blogging that went on (here and here and here) in advance of the meeting. Slay's aide Jeff Rainford says he put in a call to McKee on MCU's behalf, and the word he got back was that the meeting was "premature."
I introduced myself to The Rev. Richard Creason, a member of MCU's economic-development committee and pastor at Holy Trinity. He was not pleased to meet me. He said that if he'd known I was writing for the RFT's blog, he wouldn't have spoken with me the previous week. Why the distinction? He says my writing for the print edition might've been more "tempered."
Meanwhile, I've got just one question: Paul, does this mean I won't see you at RFT's Best of St. Louis party on Thursday?
Support Local Journalism.
Join the Riverfront Times Press Club
Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.
Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.
Join the Riverfront Times Club for as little as $5 a month.