Please, allow me to go out on this limb: Christopher Nolan has been good for the Batman series. The Dark Knight Rises, opening today, is receiving stellar reviews, and early screenings suggest there aren't any retractable ice skates, or ice-related puns, or enormous polyurethane phalluses (don't ever watch the Batman and Robin director's cut.) One other thing there isn't: An enormous, bombastic soundtrack single like Seal's "Kiss from a Rose," launched off the Batman Forever soundtrack.
The Dark Knight's wub-wub-wub-wub sonar effects for when anything on screen moved past the camera have proved remarkably influential in action films already, and don't get nearly enough credit for inventing dubstep, but can you turn up the volume on your Discman speakers and woo a lady with them? Okay, but if she isn't into dubstep?
Seal, on the other hand. Seal could get into anyone's mom jeans, and for good reason--nearly 20 years after the fact, I still can't help but nod whenever it goes quiet-loud on an adult-contemporary station.
It's weirdly appropriate to the movie it dominates, too--oddly beholden to the past, with its pseudo-medieval vocal hook, but also inescapably 1994; kind of goofily un-self-aware but entertaining in spite of it; evocative mostly of Jim Carrey running around in a green bodysuit. (This might just be me?)
In that way it's the only Batman movie to map properly to contemporary pop music (and culture), which is an entirely unserious pursuit that still forces its artists into awkward-fitting roles as Designated Generational Metonyms. (I'm glad we decided the decade of Ronald Reagan and personal computers is best represented by its children's intermittent fondness for Cyndi Lauper.) Batman Forever is ridiculous, but it's also slick and coherent, and if it's on I have to make myself not watch it. If it were a song, it would be "Kiss from a Rose."
If Batman, the Michael Keaton original, were a song, it would have to take into account the fact that the Batman in that movie wore plaid instead of a rubber suit, and was cloned a bunch of times, and never really fought crime so much as tried to deal with the fact that he'd been cloned a bunch of times, especially as it related to his relationship with his nearly estranged family.
It was a pretty funny movie, but I always thought calling it Batman was kind of misleading. One man's opinion. Batman Returns, meanwhile--I think the era-appropriate comparison would be to the Smashing Pumpkins' "Disarm." Sometimes you're listening to an inherently depressing Smashing Pumpkins song, or watching an inherently depressing Tim Burton Batman movie, and you just think--I wonder if this comes in Even Sadder?
It does. There are church bell samples, and Danny DeVito enacts a Biblical plague.
Batman and Robin goes beyond pop into Europop, infantile, campy, cultural exhaustion. After some excruciating trial and error I discovered that the musical equivalent of listening to Arnold Schwarzenegger ad-lib ice puns over really tentative gay porn for two hours had been lurking in my childhood all along:
Then: A well-justified reboot, the likes of which the Spider Man series could only dream of. But I'm not sure Batman Begins and The Dark Knight have a pop equivalent.
If they did, I guess it would be some kind of U2 reboot--the critic's arena-rock band, with blunt philosophical implications and a lot of Christ-figure-abuse and record-breaking tour after record-breaking tour.
Smart Comic Book Movies, like Socially Aware Arena Rock, are easy to laugh about, and to doubt, but as much as I hated "Vertigo" I'm glad U2 exists; I'd rather bands be too socially responsible than not socially responsible enough. And as ham-fisted as some of the Joker's college-dorm thought experiments were, The Dark Knight was a great movie, and better for making its villain into something more than Arnold Schwarzenegger making ice puns.
So I don't doubt The Dark Knight Rises is a great movie. But it's a great movie that, to my infinite regret, has no tonal room for a love scene set to a Seal song.
We’re keeping you informed…
...and it’s what we love to do. From local politics and culture to national news that hits close to home, Riverfront Times has been keeping St. Louis informed for years.
It’s never been more important to support local news sources. A free press means accountability and a well-informed public, and we want to keep our unique and independent reporting available for many, many years to come.
If quality journalism is important to you, please consider a donation to Riverfront Times. Every reader contribution is valuable and so appreciated, and goes directly to support our coverage of critical issues and neighborhood culture. Thank you.